- 6 hostages released after Paris siege
- Massive Clinton Voter Fraud Uncovered in Nevada
- Trump Ignores Chinese Communist Threats, Re-establishes Ties with Taiwan
- Pizzagate Child Sex Ring Scandal Keeps Getting Sicker
- Clinton scheming to seize White House through backdoor
Posted: 03 Dec 2016 02:50 PM PST
A siege in a Paris travel agency office has come to a close with the release of six hostages, but the suspect is reportedly still at large.
Local media reports suggest that the incident was a botched robbery attempt.
It started at approximately 6:30 p.m. Friday when the man, who was reportedly armed with a handgun, stormed the Asieland agency on Boulevard Massena, in the 13th Arrondissement.
On its official Twitter account, the Paris police force asked people to avoid the area.
Negotiators were called to the scene.
Reuters reported that the travel agency has been held up before and is particularly popular with Asian customers who deal in cash transactions.
Shortly before 9 p.m. local time, Paris police tweeted that the standoff had ended after police intervention. They said six people were evacuated from the office, but the gunman was not among those who came out.
AFP has reported that he fled the scene.
“There were two different floors, a ground floor and a basement," Jérôme Coumet, mayor of the 13th Arrondissement, told reporters.
"The employees were afraid that the robber would still be there, which was not the case. Everyone was released but the robber has not yet been arrested.”
Posted: 03 Dec 2016 02:37 PM PST
Massive voter fraud in the 2016 Presidential election has been uncovered in Nevada. Megan Barth from Newsmax said.
Well it appears Nevada, which has voted for the winner of the Presidency for the past 108 years may have been stolen and must be investigated by the Feds. Not Obama feds but incoming Attorney General Jeff Session must investigate this issue.
Barth interviewed Republican Assembly Candidate for District 15, Stan Vaughan, who had actual proof of the massive voter fraud in his Clark County district. A total number of 17,086 votes were cast in the District for both Republican and Democrat candidates. However, when confirmation letters were sent to the voters in the District, the US postal service returned mail from 9,200 of these voters.
Vaughn found that many of the people who are listed as deceased are still on the active voter rolls. Many of the returned mail came back with 5 people living in a vacant lot with no mail receptacle. Edward Snowden, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings and dozens of movie stars were registered to vote in District 15 according to Mr. Vaughan.
Vaughan tested a sample of 200 people of the 9,200 return mail and found that 185 of those had indeed voted. According to Mr. Vaughan, there were other serious voting system irregularities he documented.
President-elect Donald Trump lost by only 27,000 votes statewide in Nevada. So 9,200 fraudulent voters in one small Assembly district is more than 1/3 of the total margin that Trump lost by.
It was previously reported that Nevada poll workers wore defeat-Trump t-shirts at the polls during the election which was against the law and Hillary supporters were caught breaking the law before the election when registering people to vote as well.
Green Party candidate Jill Stein has asked for recounts in three states won by President-elect Donald Trump in this year's election (Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania). Her rationale for requesting these recounts was voter fraud. However, there is no indication Stein will request any recounts in Nevada.
Posted: 03 Dec 2016 02:21 PM PST
Flouting the careful diplomatic plans that the globalists have quietly laid out for the last half century, Donald Trump spoke with the President of Taiwan.
This historic phone call has signaled very powerfully that the United States will no longer stand by as the Chinese encroach upon the rest of the world.
China dismissed Trump's call with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen Saturday morning as a "petty action."
"This is but a petty action created by Taiwan. It can never change the 'one China' reality that has formed in international society," Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said. "The 'one China' principle is the cornerstone of a healthy Sino-U.S. relationship. We do not want this political foundation to be affected or destroyed by anything."
The call is said to be the first time since 1979 that a U.S. president or president-elect has spoken with a Taiwanese state leader.
Posted: 03 Dec 2016 02:03 PM PST
The Pizzagate section over at voat.co is a good source of information with lots of researchers posting their findings.Here's more material related to the on-going Pizzagate child sex ring investigation. There's so many people independently researching this that new stuff is being found regularly.
There's clearly enough evidence to warrant a full investigation. Too much creepy stuff has been found surrounding the Washington DC based Comet Ping Pong pizza joint along with the weird coded references discovered in several Wikileaks e-mails. That stuff alone should have triggered an investigation and that's just the tip of the iceberg. In fact, an investigation is even more prudent considering that the fake Jew news media and social media sites like Twitter and Reddit have gone out of their way to cover all this up.
Let's start with some more suspect Wikileaks e-mails.
This Stratfor e-mail shows several individuals discussing the term "pizza" as some type of code. It also references the infamous Jim Jones cult incident from the 1970s. But who the hell talks about "pizza" this way? Nobody asks how they will thinly slice a single slice of pizza among several people. It only makes sense if "pizza" is referring to a person.
Tony Podesta sent an e-mail to John Podesta referencing how he is still in a "torture chamber." The title of the e-mail "Last night was fun" seems to indicate that he had fun in the "torture chamber" last night. This is another very strange e-mail. Perhaps Tony could explain to FBI agents what this "torture chamber" reference is all about.
James Alefantis's Instagram profile picture has also raised some questions. He has set his Instagram profile to private to conceal his disgusting kiddy diddling pics but you can still see his profile picture which is circled below. So what exactly did Alefantis decide to use for his profile picture?
It looks as if that bust is of Antinous who was the boy lover of the Roman Emperor Hadrian. Historians believe that Antinous began a sexual relationship with Hadrian when he was 13 and Hadrian was 48. More specifically, it looks as if the photo he used is of the Antinous bust located in a Madrid museum.
Ask yourself what sort of sick person would do this? Antinous is widely considered to be a major historical symbol of pederasty. It is hard to fathom why any person would put a profile image like this on their Instagram account. That is of course unless they themselves are into pederasty.
Here's more weird stuff.
Frank Guistra who founded the film company Lions Gate and major donor to the Clinton Foundation was discovered by Pizzagate researchers to have some extremely weird connections. Guistra is connected to the Radcliffe Foundation an organization dedicated to allegedly helping "refugee" children.
Upon further inspection, it was discovered that some of the web pages associated with this organization feature secretly coded pedophile symbols. Namely the Facebook page for the Elpida Project. The main logo for the Elpida Project previously featured the pedophile symbol for "boy lover." This according to an FBI document detailing pedophile symbolism. This discovery caused them to change the logo. Fortunately, an archive of the Facebook page has been saved and can be found here.
Then you have this picture found on the Radcliffe Foundation's website featuring the same "boy lover" symbol. It looks like this photo may have been taken on-site at one of the "refugee" facilities the foundation runs.
It gets weirder. Turns out that Guistra was previously involved in some type of shell company called 222 Pizza Express Corporation dating back to 2008.
Then you have this. Corey Feldman created a song dedicated to his fellow 1980s child Hollywood star Corey Haim called "Remember 222." He also referenced "222" when commenting on Haim's death several years ago. Both Feldman and Haim were sexually abused throughout the 1980s during the height of their popularity as child actors. Based on all of this, it is quite possible that the term "222" is Feldman's reference to the child sex ring they were victimized by.
All of this shows some very strange stuff going on. The Radcliffe Foundation should be immediately investigated in order to find out if they are involved in trafficking children for sex. The fact that you have FBI identified pedophile symbols associated with an organization dealing with "refugee" children raises all sorts of questions.
Then we have a huge child sex scandal erupting in the UK surrounding youth football teams. The scandal has gotten so far out of control that the mainstream news has been forced to cover it. So for anybody saying that child sex rings don't exist, this is a story that proves otherwise.
It is also worth noting that a pizza joint in St. Louis called Dojo Pizza was previously raided by the FBI earlier this year over child pornography and child sex trafficking accusations. We should ask ourselves why this isn't happening to Comet Ping Ping. One can only assume it is because the people connected to Comet Ping Pong are within the investigative bodies themselves or have influence over them.
David Seaman who was recently banned from writing for the Huffington Post for reporting on Hillary Clinton's health problems will apparently be on The Daily Show to discuss Pizzagate. Not quite sure what to make of Seaman but it will be interesting to see how The Daily Show handles the discussion. The Seaman surname has English origins and I haven't seen any concrete evidence proving that he's a Jew. Maybe some of you in the comment section can sort that out. So far though, it seems as if the Pizzagate stuff he's been putting out has been credible and focused in on stuff we can prove. We'll just have to see how he handles his TV appearance.
Lots of sick stuff here for sure. We'll have more updates on Pizzagate as is warranted.
This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now
Posted: 03 Dec 2016 01:31 PM PST
Next month, Donald J. Trump, with hand on Bible, will be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. Or will he? The recent talk about recounting votes and ‘faithless electors’ suggests this highly contentious power struggle is far from over.
In fact, it may be just beginning.
Anybody who believes Hillary Rodham Clinton has been sent to the political graveyard by a Manhattan real estate developer has forgotten the cruel surprises of recent history (Remember the Greek referendum? Brexit anyone?). Democratic due process has devolved into something like 'The Hunger Games' for the rich – a sensational televised spectacle to entertain the elite every four years, while keeping the people believing they can effect real change.
Although it may seem implausible to some, Donald J. Trump may be denied the presidency due to a democratic system that has been corrupted to the bone by excessive wealth, power and collusion at the highest levels.
Countdown to disaster?
As the world media continues to eulogize Cuban leader Fidel Castro, the neocon-liberal establishment is quietly positioning their chess pieces for a power grab of epic proportions. As far as I can tell, there are three stages of this silent coup presently being carried out on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
The first step in the process was to perpetuate the news that although Donald Trump won the Electoral College (306-232), he failed to win the popular vote – reportedly by 2.5 million votes, at last count.
Clinton's alleged victory in the popular vote count, which continued for three weeks after Nov. 9 (keep in mind that most of the vote monitors had already gone home as these votes were being quietly tallied), could present serious complications for Trump and his chances of entering the White House, as will become clear a bit later.
Meanwhile, the blatantly anti-Trump media is conducting "thought experiments" to show how Clinton would have, could have, should have won the Electoral College if only the Electoral map had been spliced and diced here and there across the nation. The implicit media message behind all of this tomfoolery, of course, is that Wall Street-approved Clinton deserves her coronation, because, well, that is what the elite want, democratic procedure be damned.
This ongoing campaign on behalf of Clinton is much more than just sour grapes; in fact, it is a war of attrition designed to exert undue pressure on the Electoral College, the rickety institution that got Trump elected in the first place. And although it has never robbed an election from a candidate who has gained the majority of Electoral College votes, there is a possibility – and a very high one in this particular battle – of so-called "faithless electors" tipping this contest in Clinton's favor.
This represents the second stage of Clinton's attempt at reversing the results of the presidential election in her favor.
Will the Electoral College go rogue?
The Electoral College is scheduled to meet on December 19 to perform what, under normal circumstances, would be a mere formality of voting for either Clinton or Trump, according to the will of their constituents.
Needless to say, however, we are not dealing with "normal circumstances." This is a battle the Democrats have no intention of losing, no matter what the Electoral College results tell us.
The 2016 presidential campaign represents an epic power struggle that will determine the trajectory of US domestic and foreign policy like no other contest in recent history. No surprise, then, that neo-liberal lobbying groups have been exerting immense pressure on these electors to ignore the will of the people and "vote their conscience."
You'd be very wrong to think this couldn't work. If 37 Republican electors essentially break the law and vote against Trump, it will block him from winning the presidency. The Democrat’s team of lawyers and political consultants are now working around the clock to make this happen.
Micheal Baca, a Denver Democrat and a member of the state's Electoral College delegation, is one of the individuals attempting to persuade Republican electors to discard the will of the people and vote for anybody but Trump.
Baca makes no secret about his intentions to override the Constitution and go rogue.
"This is not about Hillary," he said. "This is about trying to stop Donald Trump."
The Democrat full-court press is getting results. Art Sisneros, a Texas Republican elector, confirmed this week that he would resign his position rather than perform his Constitutionally mandated task.
Before continuing, let’s take a moment and perform our own “thought experiment” and consider would would happen if Hillary Clinton somehow gets the nod for the presidency instead of Trump. If the country is not completely overwhelmed by coast-to-coast riots and protests, and there is somehow a peaceful transition of power, then Clinton can expect to face four years of the most hostile, uncooperative (Republican) Congress in American history. Although given the number of neocons who openly support Clinton and her hawkish tendencies, there could be points of agreement.
In a best-case scenario, there would be – aside from carrying out the necessary task of maintaining 'law and order' at home, while continuing on a war footing abroad – a four-year-long government shutdown. America would get its first real taste of what martial law feels like.
The American Conservative painted the following picture as to what would happen if Trump's Electoral College victory were rescinded: "Constitutional government would have broken down, and we would be facing something like a Latin American presidential dictatorship. For several years, Washington's political debate would be reduced to something like a Hobbesian war of all against all."
Is that something we really need? Apparently it is for some folks, and not least of all Green Party presidential candidate, Jill Stein.
And this brings us to the final stage of a possible Clinton coup.
Civil War, anyone?
It is generally assumed that it was Jill Stein, the Green Party presidential candidate who masterminded the call for a recount of votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. That's not quite right.
New York magazine reported that on November 17 Hillary Clinton was "urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump… The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private."
Just one day after the above article appeared (Nov. 22), Jill Stein, who came in dead last with about 3 million votes less than Gary 'What is Aleppo?' Johnson, announced she would be collecting money to recount votes in the swing states. One of the interesting things about Stein’s choice of swing states to hold recounts is that these are the very same places where Trump emerged victorious. Coincidence or not, that alone should have set off some alarms.
In any case, the reason Jill Stein and not Hillary Clinton is calling for the recount is evident: Throughout the campaign, the media hounded Trump with a single annoying question never asked of the future loser: Would he accept the results of the election in the event he lost? When Trump said he would take a "wait and see" approach, Clinton assumed a holier than thou position.
"Now make no mistake," Clinton solemnly told supporters, "by doing that, he is threatening our democracy. The peaceful transition of power is one of the things that sets us apart. It's how we hold our country together no matter who's in charge."
So now that the tables are turned, Stein is in the kitchen doing the dirty work. And the media suddenly can't get enough of this woman who haunted the 2016 election campaign like a rare phantom sighting.
Here's how News Busters tallied her sudden stardom: "When Jill Stein was the Green Party's candidate for US president, the networks only gave her 36 seconds of coverage. However, as soon as she launched a campaign to contest the presidential election and demand a recount of ballots in several key states, the evening news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC managed to find 7 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage for her in just four days. That’s more than 12 times as much coverage as in the entire campaign."
But it gets better. Stein has managed to accumulate a massive war chest to carry out the recount – $7 million at last count (or about seven times what she received during her entire presidential campaign). At one point, her recount drive was pulling in almost $5,000 every minute. Somehow that doesn't sound like Joe Voter digging deep in his Levi’s; that sounds more like big league spenders stepping up to the plate. Incidentally, when Stein first started passing the hat around, she said $2.5 million would be plenty, thank you very much. Yet every time she hit the target, a higher threshold was introduced.
Is Stein's recount campaign really about collecting some easy money while giving the Green Party some much-needed attention? Or is Stein just trying to shed some light on the dry rot gnawing away at the foundation of US democracy? All that, however necessary, seems very unlikely. After all, the recount plan was initially floated to Hillary Clinton, not Jill Stein. Thus, we must assume this is all part of a major power push for the Democrats to steal the White House from Donald Trump.
As Paul Joseph Watson summed up the situation: "Her entire campaign was backed by an establishment that wouldn't hesitate to exploit a recount to carry out the vote fraud they thought they didn't need on Election Day."
And here is where we can fit the last piece into the puzzle to understand what is really going on here. If the recount effort alone won't make much of a difference to either Clinton or Stein's chances of overturning the massive edge that Trump now enjoys, then why are they bothering themselves? Hold onto your seats, folks, this gets interesting.
The answer boils down to simple arithmetic, as well as some monkey play in the system.
Presently, Michigan has already agreed to a recount, which will be carried out this weekend and require hand-counting of ballots in the regions. This process will take many days. Federal law requires the recount to be finished by Dec. 13 – just six days before the Electoral College is expected to cast its votes.
Wisconsin has already agreed to a recount, while Pennsylvania is dragging its feet. In other words, this process will probably take us right up to Dec. 19 – the date the Electoral College is supposed to cast their votes (Why the Electoral College vote isn't valid without these voters, who could go rogue, is a question for another day).
Keep in mind that the total number of Electoral College Votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania equals 46. Now take Trump's 306 Electoral votes and subtract that amount. This leaves you with 260, which is below the 270 required for a candidate to be automatically considered the winner of a presidential election. Do you see where this is going?
Now if this recount should start to point toward a Clinton victory in these three swing states, this will present Trump with a very serious quandary. Should he kick up a fuss and protest the recount on the grounds that he won the Electoral College, this could provoke some sort of "constitutional crisis" that prevents the recount from being completed by the Dec. 13 deadline.
Now, if the matter remains unsettled by Dec. 19 this could – technically speaking – give the Electoral College's "faithless electors" yet more reason for not aligning themselves with their constituents. Or, on the other hand, the Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania votes could be considered forfeited because they failed to resolve the issue by the Dec. 19 deadline.
So if it did come down to this, who do you think will be selected – possibly by the very Supreme Court that Trump hopes to disband once in office – to be the 45th president of the United States?
Yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the candidate we have been told got 2.5 million more popular votes than Donald Trump (I would suggest Trump start a serious process to challenge those votes right now).
For those who still doubt this possibility, please consider the two latest failed grassroots movements of our times – Brexit and the Greek referendum – two examples of 'democracy in action' that the political elite has de facto canceled or put on hold indefinitely.
Such dramatic setbacks, which are becoming the rule rather than the exception, lend credence to Mark Twain's famous observation that "If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it."
In other words, the elite will always get what they want, regardless how the votes goes.
Clinton seizing the White House through the backdoor would not be the strangest thing to happen in old Washington. Just ask George W. Bush how he got elected president in 2000 by the Supreme Court, not We the People.
|You are subscribed to email updates from The European Union Times – World News, Breaking News. ||Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|